H2B Press Watch

Times of India: Trafficking racket: Indian workers file case against US employer

March 10, 2008 · No Comments

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Trafficking_racket_Indian_workers_file_case_against_US_employer/articleshow/2852060.cms 

Trafficking racket: Indian workers file case against US employer
10 Mar 2008, 1559 hrs IST,CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA,TNN

 

 
WASHINGTON: Some 500 Indian workers caught in what they claim is a human trafficking racket have asked the Indian government to protect their families in India from vengeful recruiters even as they filed a class action anti
racketeering lawsuit in the US against their American employer.

The workers, at the centre of human traffic storm in Mississippi and Louisiana, received a surprise telephone call from minister for NRI affairs Vayalar Ravi on Sunday as they held a meeting of the alliance of guest workers for dignity in New Orleans. They said the minister promised his support for their effort to break up what they say is a human trafficking racket by a major US company and Indian recruiters.

While the workers sought a meeting with the Indian ambassador in Washington DC to explain their case, the embassy has already directed the consulate in Houston to investigate the matter. Meantime, the workers also sought the minister’s intervention in preventing the recruiting company in Mumbai, which sent them to the US under false assurances, from intimidating their families in India following the flap.

The case involving the Indian workers and their alleged exploitation is more than a year old. Sometime in 2006, hundreds of welders and pipefitters, mostly from Kerala, responded to a series of advertisement placed by a recruiting company run by Mumbai-based Sachin Dewan promising green cards and permanent residency in US. Over 600 workers from all around India and some from the Gulf paid Dewan up to Rs 10 lakh (about $ 25,000 in today’s rates), often selling their homes and raising loans, for the promised “American dream”.

When they arrived in US, they discovered that there were no green cards. Instead, the workers found themselves working for Signal International, a major marine construction company, on ten-month “H-2B’’ visa that bonded them to work for it. Most of the work stemmed from the post-Hurricane Katrina labour shortage in the Louisiana-Mississippi region. The workers, many of them sent to Pascagoula, Mississippi, say they found the living conditions horrible. They were placed in cramped quarters, 24 to a 24×36 room equipped with bunk beds. They were given substandard food, for which Signal charged them $ 1050 per month, although the company claimed to have hired an Indian cook from New Orleans. “Welding and pipe-fitting are high stress jobs. We could not even have a decent nights sleep before undertaking these dangerous jobs,” said Sabulal Vijayan, a former Signal worker who first began organizing his colleagues for a protest last March, told TOI. Vijayan, who was subsequently fired by Signal, is now on a special extended visa to help US authorities in investigating the case with help from the New Orleans Workers Centre for Racial Justice.

Vijayan says when Signal and recruiter Sachin Dewan saw workers organizing they threatened him with deportation and began retaliating against the dissidents. In one incident, the company sent in armed guards to apprehend the protesters in a pre-dawn raid, as a result of which he says he attempted suicide by cutting his own wrists. “I was desperate…I was ready to die,” he says. Signal, on its part, denies all charges and say the company has gone out of its way to make the workers comfortable, spending up to $7 million to build plush new housing facilities.

The living condition has been inspected by local authorities and found to be adequate (dissenting workers say the company dressed up the living quarters before the inspections). The company also denies it has anything to do with promising green cards or permanent residency to the workers, who come under the H2B guest worker visa. The workers allege that Signal was fully aware of Sachin Dewans misleading ads and that company representatives worked closely with Dewan in the recruitment process.

The case eventually attracted the attention of local rights activists, including Saket Soni and Stephen Boykewich, who began to counsel the workers. Amid growing local media attention, more than 100 workers last week escaped the Signal “labour camps” where they had been housed and demanded that the US department of justice prosecute the traffickers. In a demonstration that local TV stations aired, they threw their hard hats en masse at the gates of the company. The workers say Signal continues to recruit fresh Indian workers through a new Mumbai recruiter S Mansur & Company, who they suspect is a front for Sachin Dewan. They are now demanding that the Indian and US governments put an immediate halt to this international trafficking ring.

“We hope minister Ravi’s commitments will be the first step by Ind in pressuring the US to bring these labour traffickers to justice,” said Saket Soni, director of the New Orleans Workers’ Centre for Racial Justice.

Meanwhile, the workers, acting under the aegis of the Alliance of Guest Workers for Dignity, filed a lawsuit in federal court in New Orleans late Friday against Signal, which is a sub-contractor for Northrup Grumman.

Categories: Uncategorized

WDSU-NBC: Outraged Indian Workers Take To The Streets

March 10, 2008 · No Comments

http://www.wdsu.com/news/15554345/detail.html

Outraged Indian Workers Take To The Streets

 

POSTED: 11:49 am CDT March 10, 2008
UPDATED: 12:01 pm CDT March 10, 2008

 

NEW ORLEANS — Hundreds of Indian guest workers rallied in the street Monday. The rally began uptown around 10 a.m. at the Coliseum Square Fountain.

 

According to a press release, 500 workers had filed a class-action anti-racketeering suit against Signal International and various recruiters, including New Orleans attorney Malvern Burnett.

 

The workers, members of the Alliance of Guest Workers for Dignity, filed the lawsuit in federal court in New Orleans late Friday.

 

According to the statement from the workers, about 500 Indian welders and pipefitters were “trafficked” to the Gulf Coast to work for signal, a Northrop Grumman subcontractor. Their complaint alleged that recruiters conspired with Signal to control the workers with “a broad scheme of psychological coercion, threats of serious harm and physical restraint.”

 

“For more than one year, hundreds of Indian workers at Signal International have been living like slaves. We paid $15,000 to $20,000 to come here because we were promised green cards and permanent residency, but they lied and gave us 10-month guest worker visas instead,” former Signal worker Sabulal Vijayan told an audience of domestic and international media on Thursday, March 6. “Signal knew about our debt and exploited us.”

 

According to the release, Vijayan and 88 other workers who had “escaped” from Signal shipyards reported themselves to the Department of Justice as victims of human trafficking on Thursday and held a dramatic action at the company’s shipyard in Pascagoula, Miss., singing “We Shall Overcome” in their native language and throwing their hard hats en masse toward the main gate.

 

The statement alleged, “The trafficking chain began in 2006 when recruiters in New Orleans and Bombay, together with Signal, used the post-Katrina labor shortage in the Gulf Coast to create a trafficking racket within the guest worker program that President George W. Bush wants to expand.”

 

“I have been a guest worker all my life in many parts of the world, and I never saw such conditions. We were forced to live in company trailers, 24 men in a single room,” former Signal employee Rajan Pazhambalakode said, according to the press release. “We spoke out to break this chain of human trafficking and protect future workers.”

 

The workers’ litigation team included attorneys from the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and the Louisiana Justice Institute.

Categories: Uncategorized

UN: USA Mistreating Migrant Workers after Katrina

March 10, 2008 · No Comments

Via Texas Civil Rights Review: http://texascivilrightsreview.org/phpnuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1184

 UN: USA Mistreating Migrant Workers after Katrina

Excerpt from March 7, 2008 report of UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Migrants.

III. THE PLIGHT OF MIGRANT WORKERS: THE CASE OF HURRICANE KATRINA

A. Background

88. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, which devastated New Orleans and other areas of the United States Gulf Coast in 2005, several hundred thousand workers, mostly African Americans, lost their jobs and their homes, and many became internally displaced persons (IDPs). Since the storm, these IDPs have faced tremendous structural barriers to returning home and to finding the employment necessary to rebuild their lives. Without housing, they cannot work; without work, they cannot afford housing. Since Hurricane Katrina, tens of thousands of migrant workers, most of them undocumented, have arrived in the Gulf Coast region to work in the reconstruction zones. They have made up much of the labour to rebuild the area, to keep businesses running and to boost tax revenue. To support their families, migrant workers often work longer hours for less pay than other labourers. For some migrant workers, wages continue to decrease. Jobs are becoming scarcer because the most urgent work, gutting homes and removing debris, is mostly finished.

89. These migrant workers, like their original local counterparts, are finding barriers to safe employment, fair pay, and affordable housing, and in some cases, experience discrimination and exploitation amounting to inhuman and degrading treatment. In fact, many workers are homeless or living in crowded, unsafe and unsanitary conditions, harassed and intimidated by law enforcement, landlords and employers alike.

90. Migrant workers on the Gulf Coast are experiencing an unprecedented level of exploitation. They often live and work amid substandard conditions, homelessness, poverty, environmental toxicity, and the constant threat of police and immigration raids, without any guarantee of a fair day’s pay. They also face structural barriers that make it impossible to hold public or private institutions accountable for their mistreatment; most have no political voice.

91. The dramatically increased presence of migrant workers in the region has fuelled local tensions over language barriers, education and health-care needs in a public services system strained by Katrina. The low-wage workers rebuilding New Orleans and the Mississippi Gulf Coast are almost entirely people of African, Asian and Hispanic and/or indigenous descent, many of whom are recent migrants from Latin America and Asia and many of whom are not proficient in English. African American residents are often pitted against migrant workers new to the area, with racial and ethnic tensions between marginalized minority groups in the region escalating. Moreover, as some internally displaced persons return to the region, concern is rising that migrant labourers have diminished job prospects for pre-Katrina residents. Day labourers shared stories with the Special Rapporteur about how they are paid less than promised, or not at all. They note that they are trying to rebuild a city that welcomed them when the most dangerous work needed to be done; only to rebuff them as the pace of rebuilding diminishes.

92. The stories of workers across the New Orleans metro area and the Gulf Coast after Katrina are not simply tales of personal plight. They are also stories about institutional responsibility. In the days following the hurricane, certain agencies of the federal Government came under fierce criticism for being slow to act. Yet, in actuality, other parts of the federal Government sprang into action quite quickly with a range of policy initiatives that were breathtaking in their scope and impact on workers.

93. The treatment of workers in New Orleans constitutes a national human rights crisis. Because these workers are typically migrant, displaced, undocumented, or have temporary work authorization, they have little chance to hold officials and private industry accountable (e.g., many cannot vote, while displaced New Orleanais continue to experience barriers to voting). New Orleans is being rebuilt on the backs of underpaid and unpaid workers perpetuating cycles of poverty that existed pre-Katrina. Hurricane Katrina helped create a situation where there is no Government or private accountability for the creation and maintenance of these inequities. Internally displaced voters have no voice back home, and reconstruction workers are either non-residents or non-citizens. As a result, contractors have free reign to exploit workers, and the Government has felt little pressure to ensure that migrant workers are protected and able to access what is needed to meet basic human needs.

94. As noted above, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families establish workers’ rights to (a) a safe and healthful workplace, (b) compensation for workplace injuries and illnesses, (c) freedom of association and the right to form trade uni*ns and bargain collectively, and (d) equality of conditions and rights for immigrant workers.

95. Immigrant workers, including those who migrated to work in the regions affected by Katrina, often experience violations of these rights. Lack of familiarity with United States law and language difficulties often prevent them from being aware of their rights as well as specific hazards in their work. Immigrant workers who are undocumented, as many are, risk deportation if they seek to organize to improve conditions. Fear of drawing attention to their immigration status also prevents them from seeking protection from Government authorities for their rights as workers. In 2002, the Supreme Court stripped undocumented workers of any remedies if they are illegally fired for uni*n organizing activity. Under international law, however, undocumented workers are entitled to the same labour rights, including wages owed, protection from discrimination, protection for health and safety on the job and back pay, as are citizens and those working lawfully in a country.

96. Furthermore, pre- and post-Katrina policies and practices of local, state and federal government agencies have had a grossly disproportionate impact on migrants of colour, in violation of the United States Government’s obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and other human rights norms that the United States has ratified.

B. Institutional responsibility

97. Personal stories recounted to the Special Rapporteur illuminate the commonality of the struggles faced by migrant workers but also the institutional responsibility, and how both policies and practices perpetuate structural and institutional racism and xenophobia. Across the city of New Orleans, workers - both returning internally displaced persons and new migrant workers - list calamities that have become routine: homelessness, wage theft, toxic working conditions, joblessness, police brutality, and layers of bureaucracy. These shared experiences with structural racism unite low-wage workers across racial, ethnic, and industry lines. Thousands of workers now live in the same conditions: they sleep in the homes they are gutting or in abandoned cars that survivors were forced to leave behind; they are packed in motels, sometimes 10 to a room; and they live on the streets. Most migrant workers were promised housing by their employers but quickly found upon arrival that no housing accommodation had been made available. Instead, they were left homeless.

98. By all accounts, state and local governments have turned a blind eye to this dismal housing situation. Although the city depends on migrant workers to act as a flexible, temporary workforce, it also made no arrangements to provide them with temporary housing. As a result, the workers who are rebuilding New Orleans often have nowhere to sleep.

99. The federal Government has sent mixed messages. On the one hand, it relaxed the immigration law requirements relating to hiring practices, thereby sending a message to contractors that hiring undocumented workers was permissible if not condoned. On the other hand, federal authorities failed to assure these workers and their family members that they would not be turned over to immigration authorities.

100. New migrant workers on the Gulf Coast have experienced a range of problems relating to wage theft which include:

  • Non-payment of wages for work performed, including overtime
  • Payment of wages with cheques that bounce due to insufficient funds
  • Inability to identify the employer or contractor in order to pursue claims for unpaid wages
  • Subcontractors - often migrants themselves - who want to but cannot pay wages because they have not been paid by the primary contractor (often a more financially stable white contractor)

 

101. These conditions are particularly salient for migrant workers, especially if they are undocumented as they are more easily exploitable. They may be hired for their hard manual labour and then robbed of their legally owed wages. The situation is exacerbated by the complexity of local employment structures. Because there are multiple tiers of subcontractors, often flowing from a handful of primary contractors with federal Government contracts, workers often do not know the identities of their employers. This is typical of the growing contingent of low-wage workers throughout the country. In New Orleans, workers explained that without knowing the identity of their employer, they cannot pursue wage claims against them.

102. Numerous workers have witnessed immigration raids by ICE and local law enforcement across the city of New Orleans, at large hotels downtown, the bus station, hiring sites across the city, the Superdome, on work sites, in the parking lots of home improvement stores, and even inside homes that workers are gutting or rebuilding. Workers report frequent immigration raids; retaliatory calls to immigration authorities, or threats of such calls, by employers; and collaboration between local law enforcement agents and ICE to the benefit of employers.

103. The lack of labour and human rights enforcement in the Gulf Coast stands in stark contrast to the aggressive tactics employed by local police and ICE, who readily respond to tips from unscrupulous employers who report workers that voice employment-related grievances. As a result, ICE raids on day labourer and other work sites have increased substantially in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Both ICE and the Department of Labor have expressed their commitment to developing a process whereby ICE will determine, before deporting any worker detained on the Gulf Coast, whether the worker has any unpaid wage claims. Although ICE and the Department are reportedly engaged in ongoing consultations on this subject, no agreement appears to be in place. Workers live in fear of these tactics every day and most cannot or will not complain for fear of more severe repercussions.

Categories: Uncategorized

Blog: Pascagoula: Scene of a mutiny

March 10, 2008 · No Comments

http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005083.html

Pascagoula: Scene of a Mutiny (updated)News

The plight of South Asian (mostly Malayalee) indentured servants workers employed by Signal International at shipyards in Pascagoula, Mississippi started gaining notice in more of the mainstream media late last week, and this week should see the sad story gain even greater visibility…and a stronger reaction on behalf of the workers. First, a quick background on the situation, in which these workers, among many other immigrant laborers, were brought over to help clean up the mess left behind by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita work at the shipyards (but many others to do hurricane recovery work):

About 100 Indian workers walked off their jobs at Signal International, a Pascagoula shipyard Thursday.

They talk of broken promises and shattered dreams. The Indian workers came to America for job opportunity. They now face the risk of being deported after quitting their jobs at Signal and accusing the company of illegal “human trafficking…” 

I slit my wrists to kill myself. There was no other option for me. I didn’t know what I was doing. The situation forced me to do so. I was in a horrible situation. Signal was retaliating against me for organizing my people for our rights,” he told the group of fellow workers and visiting media.

They talk of living “like pigs in a cage” in a company-run “work camp.”

“I’ve been a guest worker all my life. I’ve never seen these kinds of conditions,” said the interpreter, “We lived 24 people to a room. And for this, the company deducted $1,050 a month from our paychecks…” [Link]

 

 

This sounds more like Dubai than Pascagoula! Although ~100 workers picketed, there are actually 4-6 times that many who are stuck in the same situation but didn’t want to expose themselves in such a high profile manner, or have their families worry about them. For additional background I point you to SAJA’s coverage and also to Maitri’s blog. This ABC news article has a link to an inspiring slideshow wherein the workers are photographed ceremonially casting off their hard hats, the symbols of their servitude, as if they were shackles. In response, Signal issued this press release saying that the accusations are “baseless.” Uh huh.

 

 

 

 

Evidence of “baseless” accusations by the workers

Is there an impending lawsuit on behalf of these workers? Arun Venugopal at the SAJA forum blog starts his post this way:

For several months I’ve been seeing mention of a job opening for a Malayalam-and-Hindi speaking paralegal at the Southern Poverty Law Center, in Alabama. I couldn’t imagine what the exact need was, but much as I tried, I couldn’t get a full answer from the people at SPLC. Clearly, there was some sort of litigation in the works and they didn’t want to tip their hand. All they could say was that there an “increasing number of Indian guestworkers seeking assistance from our office with labor trafficking and exploitation as part of a larger trend that involves recruiting workers from farther away and charging increased recruitment fees…” [Link]

For those of you legal-eagle mutineers in search of an honest mutiny to join, there is still a job opening at the SPLC:

Bilingual Paralegal

Legal
Full time

The Immigrant Justice Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center is seeking a bilingual (Hindi and English) paralegal for its Immigrant Justice Project. The Project represents low-income immigrants in high-impact employment and civil rights cases throughout nine states in the South.

This is a one year position, with a heavy focus on preparing applications for immigration relief on behalf of workers who are victims of human trafficking and other crimes. Extensive travel is required. The paralegal should be fluent in Malayalam or Hindi A commitment to immigrant rights is essential.

The paralegal will perform extensive outreach to clients and assist with field investigations, preparation of immigration documents, discovery, and trial preparation. The paralegal will also assist the Center’s attorneys with case management and support, conduct research, and organize information. [Link]

There are other organizations looking to help these workers as well. One of the more prominent ones is the New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice. They have published this heartbreaking look at many of the situations/stories in which workers (both native and immigrant) have been exploited during the hurricane recovery efforts. Here is the story of Pravit, a South Asian worker:

“It was scary because there were troops patrolling the area all the time. We were afraid that if the soldiers arrested us, they would deport us.“We stayed in three different hotels…[The third hotel] was ruined. It had no electricity or hot water. We couldn’t drink the water there. We had to stand in line at the water truck to be rationed water. We had to light candles to cook in the evening…[our supervisor] told us we had to draw the curtains in the evening so no light would show. He said the hotel was declared off limits and we weren’t supposed to be staying there. I didn’t feel good. We had to hide at that hotel.

“While we were at the third hotel, we ran out of money for food and propane…and we ran out of rice. We had no food and we were hungry. We told our supervisor. He said he didn’t have any money, either, and that the owners of the places we were cleaning had paid our main boss our wages but the main boss had taken all the money and gone back to North Carolina.

“At this time I felt helpless.”

Returning to the plight of the Signal workers, the Indian government is now getting “involved”:

Even as their Mumbai-based recruiters tried to wash their hands off workers protesting over inhuman living conditions in Pascagoula, Mississippi, Minister of Overseas Indian Affairs Vayalar Ravi has written to the Indian ambassador in Washington to investigate the matter.

The minister’s letter comes after Hindustan Times reported on the plight of the 120-odd Indian workers on Saturday. “I’ve written to the ambassador,” Ravi said. “I’ve also asked him to send a team of officials to the shipyard.” Added Rahul Chhabra, Embassy of India spokesman in Washington: “We are ascertaining full details from our consulate in Houston, which is looking into the matter…” 

Dewan Consultants Pvt Ltd, the Mumbai-based recruiter for Signal International, distanced itself from the controversy saying its contract with the workers had ended last year.

“Our responsibility ended as soon as their probation period got over. Legally, we are not responsible for what happened afterward,” said Sachin Dewan, MD, Dewan Consultants Pvt Ltd.

He added: “If they found the living conditions unfit, they should have come back then, instead of making a hue and cry now…” [Link]

The funny thing is that Signal International’s “news” page doesn’t mention any of this. I wonder why?

If you want to ask them you can contact them here:

Corporate Office
P.O. Box 7007
Pascagoula, MS 39568
601 Bayou Casotte Parkway
Pascagoula, MS 39581

Phone: 228-762-0010

More on this topic soon… (and expect to see new SM banners soon featuring these mutineers).

 

Correction: This particular incident is not directly tied to the Katrina or Rita clean-ups. This is just about being exploited working at the shipyards. However, the hurricanes caused a massive worker shortage which is why these men were brought over.

Update: Here is a copy of the lawsuit filed on behalf of the workers by SPLC, the Worker’s Center for Racial Justice, and the Asian American Legal Defense Fund

KURIAN DAVID, SONY VASUDEVAN SULEKHA,

PALANYANDI THANGAMANI,

MARUGANANTHAM KANDHASAMY, HEMANT

KHUTTAN, ANDREWS ISSAC PADAVEETTIYL,

and DHANANJAYA KECHURU, on behalf of other

similarly situated individuals, and SABULAL

VIJAYAN, KRISHAN KUMAR, JACOB JOSEPH

KADDAKKARAPPALLY, KULDEEP SINGH, AND

THANASEKAR CHELLAPPAN, individually,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SIGNAL INTERNATIONAL LLC, MALVERN C.

BURNETT, GULF COAST IMMIGRATION LAW

CENTER, L.L.C., LAW OFFICES OF MALVERN C.

BURNETT, A.P.C., INDO-AMERI SOFT L.L.C.,

KURELLA RAO, J & M ASSOCIATES, INC. OF

MISSISSIPPI, GLOBAL RESOURCES, INC.,

MICHAEL POL, SACHIN DEWAN, and DEWAN

CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. (a/k/a MEDTECH

CONSULTANTS).

Defendants

Here is one of the many charges:

9. Plaintiffs assert class action claims against Defendants arising from violations of 

their rights under the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (“TVPA”); the

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”); the Civil Rights Act of 1866

(42 U.S.C. § 1981); the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1985); collective action claims

under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); and claims for damages arising from

fraud/negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract. Plaintiffs Sabulal Vijayan, Jacob

Joseph Kadakkarappally, Kuldeep Singh, Krishan Kumar, and Thanasekar Chellappan also

bring individual claims arising from the retaliation in violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1866

(42 U.S.C. § 1981); the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1985), false imprisonment,

assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and/or negligent infliction of

emotional distress.

abhi on March 10, 2008 12:43 AM in Law, News · T·r·a·c·k·b·a·c·k address · Direct link · Email post

 

Categories: Uncategorized